Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Map of Mass. Pro-Life Action

View Massachusetts Pro-Life Action in a larger map

advertisement:



story ideas, suggestions, comments: tips@massprolife.org - DMCA Contact - Advertising - About us and Writers


When You Send Your Child to Public School: Are You Still the Parent?

by: MCFL News

Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 19:08:29 PM EDT


Parents place a great deal of trust in the public schools by placing their greatest treasure, their children, in the care of teachers, guidance counselors and school nurses. Parents trust that their role as primary teachers of right and wrong, and counselors of their children will be honored and affirmed; they expect that their values, and their right to teach them to their children will not be contradicted or their role subverted by others. However, in recent years, with respect to sex education, that trust has been eroded.  Now it is on the verge of being discarded and betrayed.  Why?  The Massachusetts Health Curriculum Frameworks.

WHAT ARE THE FRAMEWORKS?

The Mass. Health Curriculum Frameworks are currently the recommendations of the state as to what should be taught in public schools; local districts have some discretion as to how they are implemented. However, recent legislative attempts have been made to make Health a core curriculum subject, thereby making implementation of the Frameworks mandatory in all school districts.  (See H 3434, 2009.) No one is opposed to Health education per se (nutrition, exercise, safety), but concealed within the Frameworks is a radical form of sex education.

"REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES", HOW TO GET AN ABORTION

In accord with objectives 4.20 and 4.a of the Frameworks, teachers would be required to explain to young people the laws regarding "reproductive services", including abortion.1 Under Mass. law, parents must be involved in a minor girl's decision to obtain an abortion (Ch. 112, 12s); however a minor girl can obtain an abortion without notifying a parent by obtaining permission from a judge. In explaining state law, students in public schools would literally be taught how to obtain a secret abortion. This subverts the original intent of the law, parental involvement, and makes the judicial bypass the norm.  Do the parents and taxpayers of the Commonwealth send their children to public school in order to learn how to obtain a clandestine abortion?  Furthermore, legislators in the current session have introduced a bill, H 1746, which would allow teachers, guidance counselors, psychologists and social workers to give consent for a minor girl's abortion!!

MCFL News :: When You Send Your Child to Public School: Are You Still the Parent?
According to the most recent data available from the Guttmacher Institute,
• Massachusetts has one of the lowest teen birth rates in the U.S. (48th);
• however, Massachusetts also has one of the highest teen abortion rates in the nation (11th).2

In other words, teens in Massachusetts are having fewer children as a result of increased recourse to abortion. Are the Frameworks an attempt by the Legislature to further expand the role of abortion in Mass. in order to address the issue of teenage pregnancy?

Conspicuously absent from the objectives on Reproduction and Sexuality is any presentation of prenatal development, leaving young people ill-informed about the nature of the abortion debate and even more ill-informed with respect to making decisions about their personal behavior. Also absent is any discussion of recent research indicating potential adverse psychological effects of abortion on many teenage girls.3

SUBVERTING THE WISHES OF PARENTS; FAILED PUBLIC POLICY

Although Mass. Citizens for Life is concerned primarily with the impact of the Frameworks on the number of abortions, we are also concerned with respect for the rights of parents and the well-being of young people.

According to a Zogby poll taken in 2003, only 7 % of parents of school aged children believe that the best message for sex education programs is, "It's OK for teens in school to engage in sexual intercourse as long as they use condoms". (47 % endorsed "wait until marriage", 32 % "wait until they were in a relationship near marriage", and 12 % "wait at least until finished high school").4

Yet the predominant focus of the specific objectives regarding sexual activity, pregnancy and STI prevention is "methods" and "behaviors", with only token inclusion of abstinence. Students as young as eleven years old, and continuing through high school would be taught "whom to consult", "methods for pregnancy prevention", and "policies of various states... regarding STI prevention among youth". In other words, as young as 11 would be taught how/where to get birth control without the knowledge and consent of parents! Tacit approval is given to premarital sexual relationships for students as young as 14. 5

These objectives further extend a failed public policy with respect to both teen pregnancy and STI's by creating a false sense of safety among the young, and inadvertently encouraging them to take more risks.  After more than two decades of promoting "safer sex" strategies to prevent STI's, the CDC recently found that:

• 26% of teenage girls in the U.S. has at least one STI
• This includes 48% of African American teenage girls
• The most common STI's were HPV and Chlamydia. 6

As noted on the CDC website, "HPV can infect areas that are not covered by a condom-so condoms may not fully protect against HPV.  So the only sure way to prevent HPV is to avoid all sexual activity." 7  

RECOMMENDATION

Because portions of the Mass. Health Curriculum Frameworks include such a radical form of sex education and a critical disregard for the rights of parents, we urge parents and concerned citizens to contact their legislators and express their opposition to any mandatory implementation of the Health Curriculum Frameworks.

(To view the Frameworks online, visit: http://www.doe.mass.edu/framew...
See pages on Reproduction/Sexuality, Family Life, and Disease Prevention and Control. p.31, 32)

*******************

1   Mass. Comprehensive Health Curriculum Frameworks, 1999
Objective 4.20: Identify resources available for treatment of reproductive health problems
Objective 4.a:  (Law and Policy. Connects with History & Social Science: Civics & Government) Identify and explain laws about reproductive services
   www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/health/1999/1099.doc, pages 31, 32.

2  U.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics National and State Trends and Trends by Race and Ethnicity  
 Guttmacher Institute, Sept, 2006, p. 12

3  David M. Fergusson, "Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health",
  Journal of Child  Psychology  and Psychiatry 47:1 (2006), pp 16-24

4    Robert E. Rector, et. al., "What Do Parents Want Taught in Sex Education Programs?" Heritage Foundation. 2004

5     Mass. Comprehensive Health Curriculum Frameworks, 1999.
Objective 4.7 Describe short- and long-term consequences of sexuality-related risk behaviors and identify barriers and supports for making health-enhancing decisions
Students discuss consequences around sexuality decisions. Determine and role-play steps that improve decision-making (such as with whom to consult, information overlooked)
Objective 4.8 Describe behaviors and methods for pregnancy prevention, including abstinence
Objective 4.9 Define the types of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV/AIDS, and how they are prevented
Objective 4.13 Describe the effectiveness and consequences of various pregnancy, HIV, and STI prevention methods, including abstinence
Students identify ways to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections
Objective 4.b. (Law and Policy. Connects with History & Social Science: Civics & Government)
Explain the laws and relevant court rulings concerning rights about consensual   sexual relationships and reproduction (e.g., Roe v. Wade, Bowers v. Hardwick)

6     "Nationally Representative CDC Study Finds 1 in 4 Teenage Girls Has a Sexually Transmitted Disease", 2008 National STD Prevention Conference, Chicago, Illinois, March 2008

7   Centers for Disease Control, http://www.cdc.gov/std/HPV/STD...  <5-26-

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
absurd! (0.00 / 0)
absurd that the schools which cannot give children a tylenol, can turn around and do this nonsense!

Why don't the schools just teach and leave medicine to doctors!


One Size Doesn't Fit All (0.00 / 0)
The message sent by this program is indeed abhorrent, but it also speaks volumes about the public school monopoly. What private institution - at least one seeking an extensive consumer base - would take such a hard lined position on a controversial issue and force its customers to be actively involved in its promotion?

Sadly, the public schools can be used as little more than social experimentation labs because most people have nowhere else to go. Of course, this "benefit" to the academic seers gives them even more reason to oppose any sort of market based educational reform. After all, private institutions, dependent on private funding won't have the luxury of investing such energy into social indoctrination.


Pro-Lifers Need to get involved more with curriculum development (4.00 / 1)
The abortion activists are much smarter than to think they can just get the right politicians elected.  They work through every channel they can to end innocent life.  Even such underground methods as slipping messages into students' curricula.  We need to not only expose this, but get much more involved with every facet of a child's development and also in the public policy process.

any good ideas how to do this? (0.00 / 0)
great post, but what's the first few steps?

[ Parent ]
Disengage? (4.00 / 1)
I wonder if it might be necessary for pro-life families to disengage from public schools whenever possible. Why give your kids to the state and surrender parenting rights? That's what happens.

Go private.


couldn't agree more (0.00 / 0)
it's a shame that more churches which are facing declining memberships and attendance don't jump on the opportunity to fill this void: teaching without the social programming, learning without the perversion.

They have lots of space, basic materials already, and likely retired teachers in their ranks already.  It just seems too easy, I wonder why more churches don't jump on the opportunity.


[ Parent ]
Kool-aid? (0.00 / 0)
I think a lot of churches have bought into the new social gospel movement, even Evangelicals have fallen for the environmental religion, and subsequently they are unwilling to enter the fray, even in moral matters.

In a phrase, they've been drinking an old socialist kool-aid with modern flavors.


[ Parent ]
Search




Advanced Search


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our email alerts
Actions you can take today to save lives
1. Recruit new pro-life activists/members
2. Run for office, make a difference politically
3. Market and advertise your local pregnancy center
4. Help distribute the MCFL News and other pro-life materials
5. Take action from articles here on massprolife.org

About
-MassProLife.org is a project of Mass Citizens for Life.
Check out our Picasa album.
Find us on
Facebook - Twitter

Blog Roll
Mass. political sites
-Red Mass Group
-Blue Mass Group

Mass Avowedly Pro-life political organizations
-Catholic Citizenship
-Choose Life: Massachusetts
-Coalition for Marriage and Family
-Knights of Columbus - Mass.
-Mass Citizens for Life - Blog
-Mass Family Institute
-Mass Resistance
-Operation Rescue Boston

Mass Pregnancy Centers
-Compassion Pregnancy Center - Worcester
-Problem Pregnancy - Worcester
-Visitation House - Worcester

Pro-life news
-Jill Stanek
-ProLife Unity
-LifeNews
-LifeSiteNews
-ProLife Blogs

Mass-based pro-lifers
-Dan Flynn/FlynnFiles
-Jay Guillette

PDF Archive of MCFL News
2011
-Nov./Dec.
-Sept./Oct.
-July/Aug.
-May/Jun.
-Mar./Apr.
-Jan./Feb.
2010
-Nov./Dec.
-Sept./Oct.
-July/August
-May/June
-March/April
-January/February
2009
-November/December
-September/October
-July/August
-May/June
-March/April
-January/February
2008
-November/December
-September/October
-July/August
-May/June
-March/April
-January/February




Read our review, or buy your own copy of "Answers in a Time of Miscarriage"

Powered by: SoapBlox